Davidson et al. 1991

Davidson EA, Hart SC, Shanks CA, Firestone MK. 1991. Measuring gross nitrogen mineralization, immobilization, and nitrification by 15N isotopic pool dilution in intact soil cores. Journal of Soil Science 42: 335-349.

These authors evaluated the use and limitations of the isotope-pool dilution technique when studying nitrogen dynamics in soil. Because addition of inorganic nitrogen compounds (NH4+, NO3-) can stimulate microbial activity in N-limited systems such as most soils, estimating the rate of these processes by tracking 15N through a system will almost certainly overestimate these rates. The isotope-pool dilution method, on the other hand, measures the dilution of enrichment in the nitrogen pool at the end of a particular process, relying on the assumption that additional product of metabolism will have negligible effects on the magnitude of that metabolism. In this study, immobilization of nitrogen was the main focus of investigation, comparing 15N isotope dilution in pools of either 15NH4+ or 15NO3-.

There are three key assumptions for the isotope-pool dilution method in this context. 1. Microorganisms do not discriminate between 15N and 14N; 2. rates of processes measured remain constant over the incubation period; 3. 15N assimilated during the incubation period is not remineralized. Previously, these assumptions had been evaluated for well-mixed soils, but not for unmixed field-collected soil samples. While fractionation by biological processes certainly does result in discrimination between isotopes of nitrogen, it is of negligible importance when injected solutions are very highly enriched and incubation periods are relatively short; in this case, injections were more than 90% 15N and incubations ran for 24 hours. Rates of measured processes will change if the population and / or activity of microorganisms changes, but again, over a 24-hour incubation period under controlled conditions this is unlikely. Highly enriched injections allow the use of small injection volumes, limiting the impact of nutrient enrichment. These authors were able to measure the remineralization of immobilized 15N, and estimated that between 1.0 and 1.6% of injected 15NH4+ appeared in the 15NO3- pool after 24 hours; they consider this an insignificant amount, but caution that longer incubations would almost certainly result in much more problematic amounts of remineralization.

This paper is clearly a major part of the basis of the project I am currently engaged in with Katherine from our 2009 field season at Alexandra Fjord. I probably should have read this paper long ago. The three main conclusions stated by these authors at the end of their paper I think can be quoted verbatim as justification for both why I (should have earlier) read this paper, and as a reminder to myself to include this paper in the methods & materials section of the eventual manuscript.

"Three points should be considered when applying the isotope dilution method.
1. Accurate estimation of both 14N and 15N initial pool sizes is important. Abiotic consumption of label, such as by clay fixation, can cause significant errors. A subset of intact cores may need to be destructively sampled directly after adding 15N for estimation of initial pool sizes.
2. Homogeneity of 15N enrichment throughout a soil sample is not possible, and perfectly uniform distribution of added label is not necessary. However, significant errors can arise from a bias in 15N distribution that is concurrent with a non-random
distribution of microbial processes. Distribution of label should, therefore, be as uniform as possible.
3. In situ gross immobilization rates may be overestimated by isotope dilution methods and underestimated by chloroform fumigation methods, depending on which (if any) kN factor is applied to the latter. Gross mineralization and gross nitrification estimates from isotope dilution are more reliable because these rates should not be affected by addition of 15N label in the form of the process products."

Miller et al. 2008

Miller MN, Zebarth BJ, Dandie CE, Burton DL, Goyer C, Trevors JT. 2008. Crop residue influence on denitrification, N2O emissions and denitrifier community abundance in soil. Soil Biology & Biochemistry 40: 2553-2562.

These authors conducted a factorial experiment using packed soil cores to examine the influence of varying levels of available carbon and nitrogen on the process of denitrification. The treatments consisted of addition of glucose at three levels and KNO3 at four levels in experiment 1, and additions of either red clover or barley straw crop residues with or without additional KNO3. They measured soil chemistry, including extractable organic carbon and NO3- concentration based on K2SO4 extractions, as well as N2O production, the molar ratio of N2O (N2O : (N2O + N2)), and a handful of bacterial genes by qPCR.

The experimental setup was very similar to what we used in SLSC 802 (Special Topics) in the fall of 2010; cylindrical soil cores with gas-exchange holes in the sides were filled with soil at 1 g cm-3 bulk density and a water content of 70% and placed in 1 L canning jars with lids fitted with a perforable septum for gas sampling. One important difference between this experiment and what we have done is that in this experiment, gas measurements were of total cumulative gas production, whereas we flushed each jar with ambient air after each sampling event. Presumably this difference will have important effects on the formation of anaerobic conditions and microbial consumption of N2O previously produced under less anoxic conditions.

Not surprisingly, minimal denitrification activity was found in treatments without added NO3-. Starting NO3- concentrations were 3 mg NO3--N kg-1 soil, and fell in all treatments without added NO3- to less than 1 mg NO3--N kg-1. Once this supply of readily available nitrate was used, it appears the bacteria ceased denitrification activity, or at least it was reduced.
The red clover had a much lower C:N ratio than the barley straw, 13:1 and 45:1, respectively, and more labile carbon. This difference appears to have driven the observed difference in denitrification activity, in a manner that reflects the results of the simple-C-source experiment 1. In general, more labile C and more available N leads to stronger denitrification activity and greater production of N2O; in sealed jars such as these, strong respiration under these conditions leads to anaerobic conditions and a fall in the molar ratio of N2O as nosZ-equipped microbes consume N2O as a terminal electron acceptor.

Extractable organic carbon (EOC) was a relatively poor predictor of denitrification, compared to respiration as measured by CO2 production. EOC is a measure of the instantaneous size of the pool of labile C, while respiration represents carbon that has already passed through a microbe’s metabolism. The distinction here may be between two different pools of carbon, as well as between an instantaneous snapshot measure and a series of measurements readily convertible to an estimate of the rate of a process.

In conclusion, these authors reiterate their finding that available C and available N (especially as NO3-) are strong predictors of denitrifying activity, across a range of C and N sources. I read this paper for the class SLSC 802 in the fall of 2010, but the portions describing denitrification physiology and especially the qPCR information will be generally useful to my other projects.

Delgado et al. 2010

Delgado JA, Del Grosso SJ, Ogle SM. 2010. 15N isotopic crop residue cycling studies and modeling suggest that IPCC methodologies to assess residue contributions to N2O-N emissions should be reevaluated. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems 86: 383-390.

These authors reanalyzed two recent reviews of measuring nitrous oxide emissions from agricultural systems and used a model to simulate N2O emissions and NO3 leaching associated with cropping practices in Colorado and Iowa. In general, use of crop residue instead of or in addition to synthetic fertilizers significantly altered patterns of N loss, whereas IPCC recommendations assume no difference between these N sources in regards to N2O emissions. Microbial immobilization of nitrogen, particularly associated with residues with high C/N ratios, is a major factor in these differences, and these authors provide supporting arguments for their suggestion of revisions to IPCC recommendations and modeling.

Huang et al. 2004

Huang Y, Zou J, Zheng X, Wang Y, Xu X. 2004. Nitrous oxide emissions as influenced by amendment of plant residues with different C:N ratios. Soil Biology & Biochemistry 36: 973-981.

These authors examined the role of residue quality, in the form of C:N ratio and a range of crop residues, on N2O emissions from soils. They also measured CO2 emissions, and found strong correlations between organic-matter decomposition and respiration, and nitrogen cycling.

Gas fluxes of CO2 and N2O were highly correlated across all incubations. To ensure only respiration-derived CO2 was measured, the CO2 released by urea breakdown in urea-treated treatments was calculated and subtracted; respiration in the urea-only treatment was similar to that in the untreated controls. Both gas emissions were negatively correlated with residue C:N ratios. Finally, residue C:N ratios were negatively correlated with dissolved organic carbon concentrations.

Overall, higher C:N ratios in residues seem to result in slow decomposition of mainly recalcitrant organic matter, and low CO2 and N2O emissions. Addition of urea in conjunction with crop residues produces a range of N2O emissions depending on the C:N ratio of the residues.

This short paper may serve as a model for the work I will be doing in the special topics class in soil science, fall 2010.

Trinsoutrot et al. 2000

Trinsoutrot I, Recous S, Mary B, Nicolardot B. 2000. C and N fluxes of decomposing 13C and 15N Brassica napus L.: effects of residue composition and N content. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 32: 1717-1730.

These authors studied the decomposition process by soil microorganisms when isotope-labelled crop residues were added to soil. The crop used, oilseed rape Brassica napus (also known as canola) varies its nitrogen content of tissues, and the C:N ratio, depending on levels of N inputs by fertilization. This allows variation in input organic matter quality by manipulation of growing conditions; in this experiment, both carbon and nitrogen inputs to the plant included stable-isotope labels, in the form of 13C-CO2 and 15N-KNO3. Plant residues were added to soils and incubated for 168 days.

Initial C:N ratio and especially the labile-C fraction of organic-matter inputs are major controls of both the rate of decomposition and fate of matter through the system. Additionally, temperature, particle size of residues, and water content in the soil also strongly influence decomposition processes.

Here, N mineralization (the formation of NO3- and NH4+ pools in the soil from organic-N precursors) occurred in two phases. In the early phase, up to about 3 weeks, the N cycle resulted in net mineralization. Later, mineral N pools were depleted and N was immobilized, that is, incorporated into the tissues of microbial cells.

Carbon dioxide release during the experiment occurred through two pathways. The more direct route was rapid mineralization of organic matter, which I interpret as non-incorporation of organic matter by microbes, consuming such material but metabolizing it rapidly through respiration. The second, presumably slower route was through metabolization of material after incorporation into cells through respiration. Either way, the ultimate fate of much of the organic-C in the residues was release as CO2.

Differences in the N-content of residues affected decomposition rates early in the experiment, but by about 4 months the differences between high-N and low-N residues had evened out. Only a small fraction of labelled N from residues ended up in soil mineral-N pools; the majority was either immobilized into microbial cells or remained in recalcitrant organic matter fractions. Immobilization of unlabeled, SOM-derived N was enhanced by the addition of C through a substitution effect.

These authors conclude that 15N labelling was fraught with difficulties, and both under- and overestimated some pools and processes. However, the use of their model, named NCSOIL, improved their ability to trace the fate of added material through the system. This paper represents a study similar in some ways to our planned course activity in the special topics in soil science course, fall 2010.

Smith et al. 2003

Smith KA, Ball T, Conen F, Dobbie KE, Massheder J, Rey A. 2003. Exchange of greenhouse gases between soil and atmosphere: interactions of soil physical factors and biological processes. European Journal of Soil Science 54:779-791.

These authors present a broad review paper of the role of soil physical factors, mainly temperature and water-filled-pore-space, in controlling soil emissions of the greenhouse gases CO2, CH4, and N2O. The paper’s goal is stated to be to expose a variety of researchers to the links between soil physics and soil biology, as well as the importance of these fields to current research in many disciplines on global warming.

All three gases are produced and consumed in soil primarily by microorganisms, which respond to variation in soil physical parameters in different ways. In general, both temperature and WFPS impact GHG production. Higher temperatures almost always result in increased production of gases, though the Q10 values (measuring the magnitude of response to a change of 10º of temperature) vary widely in the literature for all three gases. The effect of WFPS is different, involving upper and lower bounds, though in the middle range increasing WFPS generally promotes increased gas production. Microbes are limited in their tolerance of dry conditions, such that gas production falls rapidly below some critical WFPS value; for CO2 this threshold is near 20%. WFPS is also indirectly important, through its effects on soil diffusivity. Higher WFPS as well as higher bulk density are associated with lessened CH4 oxidation, due to reduced diffusivity of both CH4 and atmospheric O2. Very high WFPS values are associated with reduction of N2O to N2, partly by limiting O2 supplies and creating larger anaerobic microsites, and partly by preventing the escape of N2O gas into rapid-diffusion pathways; it is trapped in the vicinity of microbes capable of using it as an electron acceptor.

There are other factors controlling net GHG emissions, such as the relationship between plant productivity and water table position, which will change the relationship between rates of soil organic matter oxidation to CO2 and the removal of CO2 from the atmosphere by plants; trees in particular can lower local water tables, increasing SOM oxidation while simultaneously consuming more CO2 than the previous wetland vegetation community.

I read this paper on the suggestion of my coworkers in the special topics class of fall 2010, but it applies well to the general area of my research. The reference list includes multiple interesting papers addressing particular specialties within this large topic.

Pennock et al. 1987

Pennock DJ, Zebarth BJ, De Jong E. 1987. Landform classification and soil distribution in hummocky terrain, Saskatchewan, Canada. Geoderma 40: 297-315.

These authors present a method of analysing irregular terrain for the purposes of examining important soil parameters such as soil depth and soil hydrology. Three variables (profile curvature, plan curvature, and gradient) can be calculated from a matrix of elevation data; taken together for a given point or area, these variables can be used to classify an area into one of seven landforms. These landforms are level (for summits or bottom lands), shoulders, backslopes, and footslopes; the three non-level forms come in “divergent” (convex plan) and “convergent” (concave plan) varieties. Shoulders have convex profiles, backslopes have flat profiles (i.e. constant gradient when looking up or down the slope), and footslopes are concave. Divergent landforms shed water laterally; convergent landforms tend to collect water. Where water collects and is moving slowly, rates of infiltration will be highest, and erosion will tend to deposit, rather than remove, material at these places.

The variables required to calculate profile and plan curvature and gradient are relatively easy to calculate from a matrix of elevation data, using an interpolating topographical software package and some differential calculus. The seven categories of slope elements can be estimated in the field by eye, making for a useful method for field studies.

This paper was on the recommended reading list for SLSC 834; in addition, the course instructor is Dr. Pennock, lead author of this study. The study site, near Hafford, Saskatchewan, is perhaps 1 to 1.5 hours drive away from Saskatoon, suggesting this area may be the destination of one of the day trips scheduled for the week of August 30, 2010.