Sørensen et al. 2006

Sørensen LI, Holmstrup M, Maraldo K, Christensen S, Christensen B. 2006. Soil fauna communities and microbial respiration in high Arctic tundra soils at Zackenberg, Northeast Greenland. Polar Biology 29: 189-195.

These authors sampled soil animals from three sites at Zackenberg station, Greenland, over three days in mid-summer. Two of the sites were considered mesic heath, with a mix of Cassiope tetragona and other High Arctic species of plants, while the third site was dominated by Dryas spp. and was considered dry heath; snow melts from the dry heath up to 20 days earlier than from the mesic heaths. Soil samples ranging down to about 6cm depth were collected, stored at 5ºC for up to two weeks, and analyzed by a range of methods in the laboratories in Europe.

Different groups of soil animals were extracted by varying methods. Soil microarthropods, a diverse group dominated by Collebola and Acari, were extracted by modified MacFadyen funnels into Benzoic acid. Enchytraeids and dipteran larvae were extracted in Baermann wet funnels with heating of the samples, into tap water. Protozoa were washed from soils in water and grown on media plates in the dark at 10ºC. Nematodes were collected by the Blender-Cotton wool method of Schouten and Arp (1991). Soil microbial respiration was measured in serum bottles, with the CO2 concentration in the headspace measured at zero, 5 and 25 hours, with a fully factorial design of nutrient amendments of C, N, and P. Soil pH and soil organic matter content, but not moisture content or other nutrient concentrations were determined using methods not clearly described, though presumably these procedures were similar to standard methods.

Once abundance and biomass data was collected, comparisons between plots were made using multivariate analysis and a software package named PRIMER 5.0. My understanding is the species counts were (log+1) transformed to reduce the influence of very abundant species, then analyzed using an approach similar to Principal Components Analysis. The result of this analysis was a clear difference between the dry heath and the two mesic heaths, while the two mesic heaths were not different from each other in parameter-space. A Bray-Curtis similarity matrix was also involved, though I’m not certain I understand how.

Different taxonomic groups were identified to different taxonomic levels; 19 species of Collembola and 7 species of Enchytraeids were found, for example, but Acari were identified to suborder (Cryptostigmata (oribatids), Prostigmata, Mesostigmata) and nematodes and protozoans were counted at those high taxonomic levels. While the two mesic heath sites were only marginally significantly different from each other, there was a clear increase in abundances in the dry heath site. For collembola at least, the dry heath site was also dominated by two highly abundant species, which differed from the majority of species in the mesic sites by being unpigmented and associated with sub-surface, rather than soil-surface, regions in the soil. The higher abundance of probably bacteria-eating nematodes at the dry heath strongly suggests higher turnover of microorganisms as well as generally higher biological activity from the higher populations of most soil animals.

These authors suggest higher organic matter decomposition rates at the dry heath, which seems reasonable given the higher animal populations there. However, their attribution of higher soil pH there to higher respiration levels seems like more of a stretch, absent supporting mineralogical and soil-nutrient data.

This paper provides an excellent example of the data that can be collected and analyzed from a brief but intensive study of soil invertebrates at a High Arctic site. In addition, meaningful information about differences in biodiversity between locations can be derived from studies of organisms not identified to fine taxonomic levels.