These authors examined the responses of two major components of the denitrifying bacteria fraction of soil bacteria to the addition of labile carbon (glucose) under denitrifying conditions. Denitrification is presented as a four-step process, with enzymes responsible for shuttling nitrate to N2 via nitrite, nitric oxide, and nitrous oxide. In this study, one of the enzymes responsible for the reduction of NO to N2O, cNOR, was examined using primers optimized for two different groups of denitrifying bacteria. This gene is found only in denitrifiers, unlike another enzyme, qNOR, found in many microorganisms and associated with detoxification, rather than utilization, of dangerous nitric oxide.
Primers for qPCR are presented in a table. Specific primers for the two variants of cNOR were developed in this study for use with SYBR green-based qPCR. 16s rRNA sequences were also studied, to examine the total population of soil bacteria; for these qPCR reactions, the TaqMan primers-plus-probe system was used, based on oligonucleotides published by Suzuki et al. 2000.
Two experiments were carried out. In the first, a preliminary experiment to establish the utility of qPCR in this area was based on inoculating soils with cultures of bacteria of known cell density, followed by qPCR evaluation of those soils. Under most conditions qPCR performed well, though at low cell densities of some genera of bacteria the signal was not distinguishable from the background noise also associated with sterilized soil. The second experiment forms the main body of work of this paper, and is an examination of the population dynamics of soil bacteria, divided into the hierarchical categories “denitrifiers” and “all bacteria”, under denitrifying conditions and with varying levels of added labile carbon in the form of glucose solutions in distilled water. In the second experiment, soil nitrate was maintained at a high level, to ensure sufficient raw material for detectable denitrification activity. As N2O accumulation was one of the measures of activity, nitrous oxide reductase activity that would reduce N2O to N2 was inhibited by maintaining an atmosphere of 10% acetylene in culture jars. Soils were maintained at 70% WFPS to encourage denitrification.
Total microbial biomass was also measured, using the CHCl3 fumigation-extraction technique. While cNOR sequences are almost certainly restricted to one copy per genome, 16s rRNA sequences may range in copy number up to 15 per genome, thus estimates of bacterial populations by qPCR of 16s may have a large error associated with it. Fumigation-extraction captures all carbon associated with cells, thus contributions by archaea and fungi will not be found by molecular methods such as 16s qPCR that are specific to bacteria. However, in this study, estimates of total bacterial population by the two methods were well correlated, with r2 = 0.69.
Denitrification occurred in this study. Soils treated with additional glucose showed greater depletion of nitrate, as expected when denitrifiers increase their activity in response to a food supply and conditions already favour denitrification. These authors provide two possible mechanisms, non-mutually-exclusive, that could lead to increased denitrification activity under added glucose. First, the population of denitrifiers could expand, through both additional cell replication and activation of dormant cells. This would increase the proportion of the bacterial population composed of denitrifiers. Second, the total population of soil organisms could increase, leading to increased respiration, a decrease in oxygenation, and establishment of anaerobic conditions more favourable for denitrification. This would not necessarily change the proportion of the population composed of denitrifiers. In this study, denitrifiers increased their proportion of the population as measured by comparative qPCR from less than 1% to about 2.4% of cell numbers.
This change in population components is central to the approach using qPCR advocated in this paper. As these authors state:
“Although absolute numbers may not be achievable, gross differences and changes in population size are still detectable. The differences observed between the two denitrifier populations studied are then real differences in the responses of these populations to the conditions tested.”This general approach of examining relative changes in populations is applicable to a very wide array of studies of environmental microbiology, including my own planned studies in which the environmental factor under examination is biogeographical (i.e. latitude) and the functional diversity response is in terms of greenhouse gas cycling."
This paper is of great value to my studies. The qPCR methods are directly applicable, for example the primers presented here will be useful if I decide to examine multiple components of the denitrification pathway. The approach, as described above, is also useful. And the reference list is composed almost entirely of papers I am surprised I have not yet found in my literature searches.
No comments:
Post a Comment